Metatheories for information literacy
Published in The Association for Library and Information Science Education (ALISE) 2022 Annual Conference, 2022
Recommended citation: Choi, J. (2022, October 24-26). Metatheories for information literacy [Poster presentation]. The Association for Library and Information Science Education 2022 Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. https://iopn.library.illinois.edu/journals/aliseacp/article/view/1012
- Poster Image
- Abstract
A plethora of theories, standards, models, and (best) practices notwithstanding, information literacy (IL) continues to suffer from lingering challenges such as its under-theorization and a nagging incongruence between theories and practices. This poster argues for a metatheoretical approach that investigates philosophical questions produced by the difficulties and disagreements within scientific disciplines in a reflexive manner (Benton & Craib, 2010, pp. 1-3). This approach provides support for a more consistent foundation of IL in conjunction with an in-depth discussion among researchers and more advanced theories and practices in the field. The poster will explore aspects of IL to which metatheory can contribute such as (1) principal concepts relevant to IL (e.g., information and knowledge), (2) an understanding of how to achieve ‘literacy’ (e.g., philosophy of education), and (3) the integration of the internal and external elements of IL practices (e.g., social elements of information behavior). To this end, it adopts a qualitative content analysis of principal frameworks, standards, and models of IL to compare the explicit and implicit metatheoretical—ontological, epistemological, and axiological—assumptions within existing IL theories and practices. This poster will use a ‘case study’ of the conventional data-information-knowledge-wisdom (DIKW) model (Ackoff, 1989)—which remains prevalent in IL instruction—with regard to disparate conceptualizations and their practical implications. Such an analysis holds the potential to demonstrate the significance of meta-theoretical underpinnings in IL for future research and practice.
- Author Keywords
Metatheory; philosophy of science; philosophy of information; philosophy of education; learning theory; theory and practice; DIKW
- References
Ackoff, R. L. (1989). From data to wisdom. Journal of applied systems analysis, 16(1), 3-9.
Adriaans, P. (2020). Information. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/information
Bates, M. J. (2005). An introduction to metatheories, theories, and models. In K. E. Fisher, S. Erdelez, & L. E. F. McKechnie (Eds.), Theories of Information Behavior (pp. 1-24). Information Today.
Bawden, D., & Robinson, L. (2022). Introduction to Information Science (2nd ed.). ALA Neal-Schuman.
Becker, B. W. (2018). Information literacy in the digital age: Myths and principles of digital literacy. School of Information Student Research Journal, 7(2), 2. Benton, T., & Craib, I. (2010). Philosophy of Social Science: The Philosophical Foundations of Social Thought (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Bertilsson, T. M. (2004). The Elementary Forms of Pragmatism. European Journal of Social Theory, 7(3), 371-389. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431004044199
Blaikie, N. (2007). Approaches to social enquiry: Advancing knowledge (2nd ed.). Polity.
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2017). The social life of information: Updated, with a new preface. Harvard Business Review Press.
Bruce, C., Edwards, S., & Lupton, M. (2006). Six Frames for Information literacy Education: a conceptual framework for interpreting the relationships between theory and practice. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 5(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.11120/ital.2006.05010002
Buckland, M. (2018). Document Theory. Knowledge Organization, 45(5), 425-436. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2018-5-425
Budd, J. M., & Lloyd, A. (2014). Theoretical foundations for information literacy: A plan for action. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 51(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2014.14505101001
Burns, E. A., Gross, M., & Latham, D. (2021). The Information Literacy Continuum. School Libraries Worldwide, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.29173/slw8232
Danermark, B., Ekström, M., & Karlsson, J. C. (2019). Explaining Society: Critical Realism in the Social Sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Frické, M. (2019). The knowledge pyramid: the DIKW hierarchy. Knowledge Organization, 46(1), 33-46.
Gross, N. (2009). A Pragmatist Theory of Social Mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 74(3), 358-379. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400302
Ichikawa, J. J., & Steup, M. (2018). The Analysis of Knowledge. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/knowledge-analysis/
Jennex, M. E. (2009). Re-visiting the knowledge pyramid. 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
Kerr, P. A. (2010). Conceptions and practice of information literacy in academic libraries (Publication No. 3418770) [Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Koltay, T. (2011). The media and the literacies: media literacy, information literacy, digital literacy. Media, Culture & Society, 33(2), 211-221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443710393382
Kucer, S. B. (2014). Dimensions of Literacy (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203428405
Larson, J., & Marsh, J. (2015). Making Literacy Real: Theories and Practices for Learning and Teaching (2nd ed.) https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473910508
Latham, D., Gross, M., & Julien, H. (2019). Implementing the ACRL Framework: Reflections from the Field. College & Research Libraries, 80(3), 386-400. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.80.3.386
Legg, C., & Hookway, C. (2021). Pragmatism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/pragmatism/
Lloyd, A. (2017). Information literacy and literacies of information: a mid-range theory and model. Journal of Information Literacy, 11(1), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.11645/11.1.2185
Mackey, T. P., & Jacobson, T. E. (2011). Reframing information literacy as a metaliteracy. College & Research Libraries, 72(1), 62-78.
Mayernik, M. S. (2020). Metadata. Knowledge Organization, 47(8), 696-713. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2020-8-696
McKinney, E. H., & Yoos, C. J. (2019). Information as a difference: toward a subjective theory of information. European Journal of Information Systems, 28(4), 355-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085x.2019.1581441
Mingers, J. (2014). Systems Thinking, Critical Realism and Philosophy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315774503
Mingers, J., & Standing, C. (2018). What is Information? Toward a Theory of Information as Objective and Veridical. Journal of Information Technology, 33(2), 85-104. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-017-0038-6
Nahl, D. (2017). User-Centered Revolution: 1995-2008. In J. D. McDonald & M. Levine-Clark (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science (4th ed., pp. 4847-4871). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1081/E-ELIS4-120044680
Pavese, C. (2021). Knowledge How. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/knowledge-how/
Phillips, D. C. (1995). The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: The Many Faces of Constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24(7), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x024007005
Porpora, D. V. (2015). Reconstructing Sociology: The Critical Realist Approach. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316227657
Ritz, B. (2020). Comparing abduction and retroduction in Peircean pragmatism and critical realism. Journal of Critical Realism, 19(5), 456-465. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2020.1831817
Ryan, S. (2020). Wisdom. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/wisdom/
Saunders, L., & Wong, M. A. (2020). Learning Theories: Understanding How People Learn. In Instruction in Libraries and Information Centers: An Introduction (pp. 37-58). Windsor & Downs Press. https://doi.org/10.21900/wd.12
Schachter, D. (2020). Theory into practice: Challenges and implications for information literacy teaching. IFLA Journal, 46(2), 133-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035219886600
Schneider, R. (2013). Research Data Literacy. In S. Kurbanoğlu, E. Grassian, D. Mizrachi, R. Catts, & S. Špiranec (Eds.), Worldwide Commonalities and Challenges in Information Literacy Research and Practice. ECIL 2013. Communications in Computer and Information Science, Vol. 397, 134-140. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03919-0_16
Sequoiah-Grayson, S., & Floridi, L. (2022). Semantic Conceptions of Information. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2022 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2022/entries/information-semantic
Shipway, B. (2010). A Critical Realist Perspective of Education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203881880
Todd, R. J. (2017). Information Literacy: Agendas for a Sustainable Future. Journal of Information Literacy, 11(1), 120. https://doi.org/10.11645/11.1.2233
Townsend, L., Brunetti, K., & Hofer, A. R. (2011). Threshold Concepts and Information Literacy. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 11(3), 853-869. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2011.0030
Wheelahan, L. (2012). Why knowledge matters in curriculum: A social realist argument. Routledge.
Young, M. (2008). Bringing knowledge back in: From social constructivism to social realism in the sociology of education. Routledge.
Zurkowski, P. G. (1974). The Information Service Environment Relationships and Priorities (ED100391). ERIC, National Commission on Libraries and Information Science. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED100391.pdf